"white people can’t danc-"
"white people can’t twer-"
"white people can’t danc-"
"white people can’t twer-"
Fact: If there were a button I could press to make Sir Patrick Stewart a regular fake news correspondent I would never stop pressing it
Alek Wek on Lupita Nyong’o’s NAACP Image Awards acceptence speech:
“I was amazed and very humbled by Lupita’s words, and I am so proud and happy that her talent was deservedly recognised with her Oscar award.
When I was growing up, my mother taught me and my sisters to celebrate each other - there was no room in our household for negativity. She taught us to embrace each other and this was empowering for us. She also taught us the value of celebrating our differences.
When I first started modeling I realised I was very different from many of my colleagues, but I welcomed the opportunities my career in fashion offered me, and the support from many inspiring individuals in the fashion industry. And because of this I have always strived to use the platform I have in fashion, to champion the ideals of what is beautiful.
For me it always goes back to what my mother taught me and my sisters. That all women are beautiful and we should embrace each other. True beauty is born through our actions and aspirations and in the kindness we offer to others. Beauty should not be culturally relevant, it should be universal.”
Source: Essence Online
Peter Nyong’o’s Oscars selfie game strong
peter knew this was some once in a lifetime shit and he took full advantage
They tried it.
lmao that bottom right
didnt they tho?
that last shrug was “sorry not sorry” lmaoo
MEXICAN?? DO THEY NOT SEE HER SKIN???
While she was born in Mexico I can’t with the amount of reaching. A Black woman can never just be Black and great.
to be fair i would say the same thing if you asked me about america.
this ain’t the fucking olympics.
Portrait of Elizabeth Murray
England (c. 1650)
Oil on canvas, 124 x 119 cm
I think I have seen pictures of this before, in high school maybe, but I don’t remember there being a second person before. I seem to remember this image being cropped differently too, which is very disturbing because now that I see the entire painting, the way I remember it being cropped was very clearly and deliberately intended to remove the person holding the tray of flowers.
Since we’re throwing haymakers at the kyriarchy today, I think this is something that we should really be talking about too, because it happens
ALL. THE. TIME.
Level 1: People of Color from Medieval, Renaissance, and other Early Modern European works were often literally painted over in later decades or centuries.
Level 2: It was very fashionable in a lot of 17th and 18th century paintings to have a Black servant featured in portraits of very important historical figures from European History.
Honestly? They’re practically ubiquitous. A lot of the very famous paintings you’ve seen of European and American historical figures have a Black servant in them that have been cropped out or painted over.
Those silly stock photos from your American History Professor’s Powerpoint?
Your Professor’s PowerPoint for “George Washington”:
The actual painting:
Your professor’s Powerpoint on Jean Chardin:
The actual painting:
PowerPoint on Maria Henriette Stuart (with some commentary about the Habsburg jaw):
But, because of whitewashed history curricula, teachers and professors continue to use the cropped images because they don’t want their lecture to get “derailed” by a discussion about race.
These images are also more commonly seen on stock photo sites, including ones for academic use.
I honestly can’t find anyone really writing about this, or even any analysis on how often the cropped photos are used.
The reason they are so easy to crop out is because of the the artistic conventions which reflect the power hierarchy:
Oil paintings of aristocratic families from this period make the point clearly. Artists routinely positioned black people on the edges or at the rear of their canvasses, from where they gaze wonderingly at their masters and mistresses. In order to reveal a ‘hierarchy of power relationships’, they were often placed next to dogs and other domestic animals, with whom they shared, according to the art critic and novelist David Dabydeen, ‘more or less the same status’. Their humanity effaced, they exist in these pictures as solitary mutes, aesthetic foils to their owners’ economic fortunes.
This is drastically oversimplified, but at least it addresses it directly.
If anyone knows more on any studies or statistical evidence on this tendency, feel free to add it.
Everyone needs to read this post. I’ve seen some of these cropped images so often it never even occurred to me that this wasn’t the whole image - it definitely wouldn’t have occurred to me to do research beyond the Google Image result if (to use the example) I needed an image of Washington for a powerpoint. I’m an archaeology graduate student and TA and I do some work (and eventually, presumably some teaching) in US historical archaeology, so it’s probable that at some point I’ll be preparing a lecture that I’ll want to illustrate with an image of Washington or some other prominent figure. Far from wanting to avoid an uncomfortable discussion about race, I would so much prefer to show the full image - my god, especially if I imagine teaching about the archaeology of Mount Vernon, showing these full images of Washington and the people around him would make that discussion so much more enriching.
But I’m an archaeologist, not an art historian, not very familiar with these paintings and not trained to look critically for signs of cropping or other modification, and my first stop for illustrating a talk is Google Images, not an art gallery. I’m not interested in avoiding discussions of race, rather I’m super invested in having those discussions - and I can’t do that as well if I don’t even suspect that there’s something missing from the images I’m using.
But now I’ll remember this, and be suspicious, and look a little further into the first usable picture I find when this comes up in my teaching, as it inevitably will.
medievalpoc, I think you run the most important blog on the internet right now, thank you for doing this.
I think if enough of us take an interdisciplinary approach, we have the chance to make a REALLY huge difference!!!!
Les faize d’Alexandre (a translation of Historiae Alexandri Magni of Quintus Curtius Rufus), Bruges, c. 1468-1475
In my opinion when my teacher ‘crop’ a photo, they’re actually not the ones cropping it. They gets the photos off the internet. And to be honest even though I’m in an A.P. Class, many students still get really focused and distracted on what’s in the background of the photos when we are supposed to be focused on the historical figure. So it’s often better to used the cropped photo as it keeps the focus. But it doesn’t mean that they’re not teaching about the artistic and cultural impacts of the African community on the Caucasian community. We do see the actual pictures; and we do learn the actual stories.
1. I felt like I allowed for that in the original post? A lot of educators themselves don’t know when they’re using a cropped photo. Databases for educators often will use historical images that have already had everything cropped out of them.
2. You mention that students get “distracted” by what’s in the background of the images, when they’re “supposed” to be focused on the “historical” figure. Might I remind you that I’m saying that is part of the problem-that someone decided who was important in history, and who was NOT important enough to bother including in class material. I also pointed out that regardless of INTENT, the RESULT is the same. You’ve said this, more or less, but I think that needs to be re-emphasized.
I think it also says a lot that the general opinion seems to be that the PROBLEM WITH SHOWING PEOPLE OF COLOR IN HISTORICAL IMAGES IS THAT STUDENTS WILL BE TOO INTERESTED.
^That says a lot about the state of education in the U.S. if students actually being interested is the problem.